Legal Opinion

Baker v. Shavers, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1990No. 17670PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a personal injury case. Robert and Doris Baker have appealed the jury’s determination that Doris and Shavers, Inc. were equally negligent in causing Doris’ injuries when she fell in the department store operated by Shavers. The Bakers also have appealed the trial court’s denial of their motion for judgment n.o.v. or for a new trial. We reverse the judgment and remand the case for a new trial on the basis of our decision in Harrison v. Taylor, 115 Idaho 588, 768 P.2d 1321 (1989).

I

HARRISON v. TAYLOR APPLIES RETROACTIVELY.

The jury was instructed that Shavers had no duty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Robertson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Jones v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bates v. Eastern Idaho Regional Med. Ctr.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fuller v. WoltersIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mac Tools, Inc. v. GriffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Vickers v. Hanover Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. V-1 Oil Co. v. Idaho Petroleum Clean Water Trust FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API