Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Austin v. Curtis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus to compel respondent to record a deed left with him in escrow.

1Per curiam

The return shows, and the case made

by relator is to the same effect, that the respondent did not receive the paper officially, but as a private person to hold it in escroiv. Delivery and record having been forbidden by the grantor, respondent cannot be compelled to decide upon the rights of grantor and grantee, and any controversy between them must be settled in a proper suit in which he would have no personal concern. He *724never had possession of the document in his official capacity, and has no official duty to perform concerning it. The grantor had no notice of this motion, and no-, relief…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Eberle v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Brigham v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Bisard v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API