Legal Opinion

Bisard v. Sparks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1903No. Docket No. 24PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Newaygo; Palmer, J. Bill by Alice Bisard and others against George Sparks, Emma L. Sparks, Edith Sparks, and Lewis J. Crawford, guardian of Edith Sparks, an infant, to set aside a deed. Erom a decree for complainants, defendant Edith Sparks appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Complainants filed a bill to have a deed executed by their father, Barnid Clark, to the defendant Edith Sparks, declared void and canceled, as also a lease executed by the defendant Crawford, as general guardian of Edith Sparks, a .minor, to her codefendants, George Sparks and Emma L. Sparks. From a decree finding that there was no consideration for said deed, and that it was never delivered to said Edith Sparks nor to any one in trust for her, and granting the relief prayed, the defendant Edith Sparks appealed.

The record discloses that George Sparks first became acquainted with Barnid Clark,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Prutsman v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Souverbye v. ArdenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  3. Thatcher v. Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Andrew's ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Wellborn v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  5. Gilbert v. North American Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1840

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butts v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Stevens v. BurgessMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Butts v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API