Legal Opinion

Bond & Goodwin, Inc. v. duPont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

Plaintiff buyer sues the sellers to recover the difference between the purchase price paid for certain bonds and the price which the bonds would have cost had the true callable date been known. Similar contracts were made for the sale of two lots of North Dakota, Series B and Series C real estate bonds of the supposed callable dates of January 1,1949, and January 1, 1948. Aside from minor adjustments, the actual price was to be determined by an amount which would represent a yield respectively of 3.70% and 3.60% per annum from the dates of purchase to the callable dates. The prices were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Otis v. Cullum, ReceiverSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Ætna Insurance v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Littauer v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Catholic Order of Foresters v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bank of Chillicothe v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1850

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Regional Securities, Inc. v. VillellaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. HolzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Lassiter v. Rellstab Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API