Legal Opinion

In re Blood Reagents Antitrust Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2012No. MDL No. 09-2081PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DuBOIS, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................226

II. BACKGROUND...........................................................227

A. Background on Blood Reagents........................................227

B. Creation of Duopoly by Ortho and Immucor.............................228

C. Post-Duopoly Price Increases..........................................228

1. Operation Create Value............................................228

2. Blood Bank Leadership Program...................................229

D. The Alleged Price-Fixing…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Messner v. Northshore University HealthSystemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Blood Reagents Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  4. Cason-Merenda v. VHS of Michigan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  5. In re Blood Reagents Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API