Legal Opinion

Stinchfield v. Little

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 15, 1821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In an action of covenant upon the issue of non est factum, the plaintiff offered in evidence the deed declared on, which was in these words : “Know all men by these presents, that I Josiah “ Little of, &c. by virtue of a vote of the Pejepscot Proprietors, “passed on the first day of September 1784, authorizing and “ appointing me to give and execute deeds for and in behalf of “ said proprietors, for and in consideration of the sum of thirty- “ seven pounds to me in hand paid…

Read the full summary

In an action of covenant upon the issue of non est factum, the plaintiff offered in evidence the deed declared on, which was in these words : “Know all men by these presents, that I Josiah “ Little of, &c. by virtue of a vote of the Pejepscot Proprietors, “passed on the first day of September 1784, authorizing and “ appointing me to give and execute deeds for and in behalf of “ said proprietors, for and in consideration of the sum of thirty- “ seven pounds to me in hand paid by Thomas Stinchfield of, &c. “ the receipt whereof I do hereby acknowledge, have given, “ granted, released, conveyed…

1Opinion of the Court

Preble J.

at this term delivered the opinion of the Court, as follows.

In this case two questions are presented for the consideration of the Court. 1. Is the deed declared on, the deed of the Pejep-scot proprietors ? 2. Admitting it not to be the deed of the Pe-jepscot proprietors, is it the deed of Josiah Little, the defendant?

Where a contract is entered into, or a deed executed in behalf of the government by a duly authorized public agent, and the fact so appears, notwithstanding the agent may have affixed his own name and seal, it is the contract or deed of the government, who alone is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stackpole v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Fowler v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  3. Sumner v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  4. Hodgson v. DexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Long v. ColburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Providence v. MillerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1876
  2. Whether the President May Sign a Bill by Directing That His Signature Be Affixed to It, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API