Legal Opinion

City of Providence v. Miller

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 22, 1876Published

Bill IN equity for specific performance. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. The respondents demurred to the bill.

1Opinion of the CourtDurbee, C. J.

This is a suit in equity brought by the city of Providence against George W. Miller and George W. Ellerbeck, to enforce the specific performance of a contract under seal. The contract purports to be an agreement of two parts, between George W. Ellerbeck, Joseph S. Johnson, and George W. Miller, parties of the first part, and Thomas A. Doyle, “ in behalf of the city of Providence,” party of the second part. The parties of the first part agree, in consideration that the city of Providence shall widen and straighten Broad Street in the manner described, to sell and convey to the party of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fowler v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Lessee of Clarke v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Dubois v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Randall v. Van VechtenNew York Supreme Court · 1821
  5. Elwell v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API