Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Eikenberry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1936No. 9858PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Mae N. Eiken-berry and Eloísa LeLievre against A. J. Mc-Coll, J. L. Erwin, A. J. McColl Land Company, and H. B. Boyd, seeking to recover damages as the result of a fraudulent sale to them of lot No. 29, in block 8, of the Hammond and Fernandez subdivision of porciones 71 and 72 in Hidalgo county, Tex.

The trial court instructed the jury in favor of J. L. Erwin and the McColl Land Company, but submitted the case as to A. J. McColl and H. B. Boyd to the jury upon special issues. In answer to these special issues the jury made the following findings of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BoolesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Stowe v. WootenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Meyer v. ViereckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Peoples Savings Bank v. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. National Citizens' Bank v. ErtzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. EikenberryTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wink v. WinkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Hughes v. BelmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Powell v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API