Legal Opinion

Paxton v. O.P.F., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1983No. 8229SC732PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant excepts to and assigns as error the trial court’s conclusion that plaintiff was entitled to recovery on a quantum meruit basis. Defendant contends that this conclusion is improper in that the theory of quantum meruit was neither pleaded by plaintiff nor tried by consent. For the court to base its judgment and award on that theory, defendant contends, was therefore both unfair and contrary to the established law in North Carolina.

Plaintiff alleged an express contract in his Complaint but the award by the court was based on quantum meruit, which was not pleaded. Quantum…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Johnson v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Talley v. Harriss Granite Quarries Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pérez Marrero v. Colegio de Cirujanos Dentistas de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  2. Environmental Landscape Design Specialist v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Peace River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ward Transformer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. TalfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Law Offices of Peter H. Priest, PLLC v. CochCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API