Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. City of Montrose

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 16, 1942No. 15,040PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE cause here presented for our consideration involves the alleged violation of a city ordinance. In the complaint filed in the police court of the City of Montrose, it is charged: "That on or about the 31st day of May, A.D. 1941, David Hamilton [plaintiff in error] violated Article 177 Section 10 of Ordinance No. 190 entitled: Peace and Quiet of said city passed on the 12th day of July, A.D. 1937, in this to-wit: That the said David Hamilton did employ a loud and offensive device and performance as a means of advertising and attracting a crowd and to the disturbance and annoyance of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Cox v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Dempsey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. In Re Hearings Concerning Canon 35Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. Flores v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Norman v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API