Legal Opinion

Norman v. City of Las Vegas

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1947No. 3470PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, District Judge:

Do the provisions of sections 3, 4, and 5 of ordinance No. 305 of the city of Las Vegas, requiring the finger printing and photographing of all persons seeking employment in establishments selling alcolohic beverages at retail for consumption on the premises (excepting the employees of cafes and restaurants) and requiring the imprints to be forwarded to the California and Federal bureaus of identification, and requiring that the chief of police of Las Vegas be notified of the returns thereon, and making it unlawful for the owners of establishments to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Eick v. Perk Dog Food Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  3. Hazlitt v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
  4. Montesano v. Donrey Media GroupNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Thom v. New York Stock ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API