Legal Opinion
Green v. Kinney Shoe Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 19, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-0365PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
Defendant Kinney Shoe Corporation (“Kinney”) has moved in limine to exclude certain witnesses proposed by the plaintiff to give expert testimony at trial. Oral argument was heard on February 16, 1989. In this memorandum and order, the Court grants in part Kinney’s motion.
I. Introduction
This case is an employment discrimination suit brought under both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and District of Columbia law, the latter of which entitles the plaintiff to a jury. Plaintiff Guy A. Green, who was a Kinney store manager in Texas, contends…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brenda Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Ernst v. Ace Motor Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- 77 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 503, 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,145 Joyce Stratton v. The Department for the Aging for the City of New York, the City of New York, and Prema Mathai-DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- In Re Meridia Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Stratton v. Department for the AgingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Arnold v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.