Strickland v. Magoun
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, James M. Quigley, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Nassau on the 27tli day of July, 19Q6, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Nassau Trial Term, the jury having been discharged. Judgment affirmed upon the opinion of Hr. Justice Burr at Special* Term, without costs.
1Opinion of the Court
The following is the opinion, delivered at Trial Term:
Burr, J.:
Prior to October 17, 1901, the defendants Francis P. Magoun and Edward V", Van Duzef, together with one George B. Magoun, were copartners, carrying on business as stockbrokers under the name of .Magoun Brothers & Co. On that date, at the request of Camillus G. Kidder, plaintiff's assignor, they purchased for his account on a margin deposited by him with them, 100 shares of. the common capital stock of the United States Rubber Company. On December 16, 1902, the firm of Magoun Brothers & Co. was-dissolved by the death of. George B.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Pease v. . EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Caswell v. . PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Union Trust Co. v. Monticello & Port Jervis Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Douglas v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cook v. FlaggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- In re the Estate of KadarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- Little v. McClainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Bank of United States v. Cooper-Bessemer Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932
- Falk v. SpingarnCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.