Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Michigan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 2006No. 04-1360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

547 U.S. 586 (2006)

HUDSON

v.

MICHIGAN

No. 04-1360.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 9, 2006.

Reargued May 18, 2006.

Decided June 15, 2006.

David A. Moran argued and reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Timothy O'Toole, Steven R. Shapiro, Michael J. Steinberg, Kary L. Moss, and Richard D. Korn.

Timothy A. Baughman argued and reargued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

David B. Salmons argued and reargued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attorney General…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Scalia; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael DreyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Lajai PridgetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Michael DreyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API