Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Lajai Pridgette

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 5, 2016No. 14-30223Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Scannlain, Circuit Judge

I concur in the court’s vacatur of the sentence and restitution order and in its remand for resentencing. I respectfully dissent from the court’s decision to limit the evidence that the district court may consider on remand to that which is in the existing record.

I

A

“The default rule is that ‘if a district court errs in sentencing, we will remand for resentencing on an open record — that is, without limitation on the evidence that the district court may consider.’ ” United States v. Flores, 725 F.3d 1028, 1043 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 885-86 (9th Cir.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. James Earl MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOC. v. WuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. James Earl MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API