Yusko v. Remizon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCoon, J.
The plaintiff has had judgment in negligence based upon the verdict of a jury against the defendants Stanley Remizon and Sophie Remizon. The complaint was dismissed in the court below as to the defendant Yincenti Remizon. Stanley Remizon does not appeal.
The facts are undisputed in any essential detail. Yincenti Remizon and his wife, Sophie Remizon, owned the building where this accident occurred. The defendant Stanley Remizon is their son, who, at the time of the occurrence, was approaching thirty-five years of age. Some four or five months before the accident Stanley had purchased a rifle,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lane v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Napiearlski v. PickeringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Abrams v. BerelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Gill v. FalkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Luce v. HartmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Conley v. LongNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Abrams v. BerelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.