Legal Opinion
Fred W. Steiner, John W. Hadzima, Olive Spicuzza, Charles Walker and Roy Pursselley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1956No. 15-56077PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellants (Fred W. Steiner, John W. Hadzima, Olive Spicuzza, Charles Walker and Roy Pursselley) and others were indicted in the District Court for the Southern District of California. The indictment was in 11 counts. Appellants pleaded not guilty and had a jury trial, in the course of which counts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were dismissed. The jury returned verdicts finding Steiner and Hadzima guilty on counts 1, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Spicuzza guilty on counts 1, 8 and 9, Walker guilty on counts 1, 10 and 11 and Pursselley guilty on count 1 only. From judgments entered on these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Keck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Eagleston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Wong Lung Sing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Gage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Thekkedajh Peethamb MenonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- John Michael Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Clifford L. Duke, Jr., Louis Glenn Ballard and Vic Buono v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Fred Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.