Legal Opinion
Moody v. Town of Carrboro
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 4, 1980No. 28PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice:
Petitioner assigns error in the denial of the motion to amend his pleading to include a further section alleging failure on the part of the Town to meet the prerequisites to annexation set forth in G.S. 160A-47(3) by not indicating in the annexation report the plans of the Town to extend bus service into the annexed area which petitioner contends is a major service provided by the Town. This argument is without merit.
The motion to amend was addressed to the sound discretion of the court. The denial of such motion is reviewable only for manifest abuse of discretion. Vending…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Justus v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Greene v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In Re Annexation Ordinance No. 300-XSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- In Re Annexation Ordinance D-21927 Adopted by City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Chapel Hill Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.