D.C. Micro Development, Inc. v. Briley

Smith, Presiding Judge.

This is the second appearance of this case before us. In D.C. Micro Dev. v. Lange, 259 Ga. App. 611 (578 SE2d 251) (2003) (“D.C. i”), we affirmed the trial court’s appointment of a receiver over the corporate defendants, D.C. Micro Development and TopDog Software, Inc. Id. at 613-614 (2). In this appeal, the corporate defendants and their principal, David Cecil, (collectively, “D.C.”) challenge the trial court’s order setting compensation for the appointed receiver, Brandyn Briley. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and did not err in any of the…