Legal Opinion
Arundel Corp. v. County Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 22, 1991No. 95, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
The Board of Zoning Appeals of Carroll County (the Board) dismissed without hearing the petitioners’ applications for conditional uses. The Board held that the content of the applications was governed by an amendment to the zoning ordinance that was enacted after the applications had been filed. We shall hold that applying the amendment in that retrospective fashion was error.
The Carroll County Zoning Ordinance (the Ordinance) identifies “extractive operations” for special treatment. Prior to February 24, 1988, § 20.14 of the Ordinance defined extractive operations as “[t]he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Riverdale Heights Volunteer Fire Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Muhl v. MaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Grasslands Plantation, Inc. v. Frizz-King Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Mastandrea v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- McHale v. DCW Dutchship Island, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Annapolis Market Place, L.L.C. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.