Legal Opinion

Muhl v. Magan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 29, 1988No. 153, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

In this administrative appeal from the Insurance Division, involving statutory regulation of medical malpractice underwriting, a combination of circumstances has allowed the case to progress to this Court without the Division ever having expressed a considered evaluation of the merits. Due regard for the administrative process requires that the matter be remanded to the Division for the application of its expertise.

I

It will be helpful to a consideration of the facts of this case, set forth in part II, infra, if we first review certain aspects of the regulatory scheme of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bd. of Ed. for Dorchester Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Bernstein v. Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. MacKlin v. Robert Logan AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Zappone v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Moats v. City of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Holiday Point Marina Partners v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API