Muhl v. Magan
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
In this administrative appeal from the Insurance Division, involving statutory regulation of medical malpractice underwriting, a combination of circumstances has allowed the case to progress to this Court without the Division ever having expressed a considered evaluation of the merits. Due regard for the administrative process requires that the matter be remanded to the Division for the application of its expertise.
I
It will be helpful to a consideration of the facts of this case, set forth in part II, infra, if we first review certain aspects of the regulatory scheme of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bd. of Ed. for Dorchester Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Bernstein v. Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- MacKlin v. Robert Logan AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Zappone v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Moats v. City of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Holiday Point Marina Partners v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.