Legal Opinion

McGill v. University of South Carolina

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 21, 1992No. 23715PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

These cross-appeals involve the recently enacted South Carolina Whistleblower’s Act, 1 pursuant to which a jury awarded Respondent/Appellant, Helen McGill (McGill), a $350,000 verdict against Appellant/Respondent, University of South Carolina (USC).

Trial court denied USC’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) but, applying the statutory cap of the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, 2 reduced the verdict to $250,000.

We affirm in part, reverse in part.

FACTS

McGill was hired on April 3, 1989, as USC’s Hazardous Waste manager, responsible for storage and disposal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Pilcher v. Board of Wyandotte County Comm'rsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  5. Hofer v. St. ClairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Duncan v. State Budget & Control Board, Division of Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Spencer v. Barnwell County HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Gastineau v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Introini v. South Carolina National GuardDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
  5. Davis v. Orangeburg-Calhoun Law Enforcement CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API