City of Grand Rapids v. Bennett
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from superior court of Grand Bapids; Burlingame, J. Proceedings by the city of Grand Bapids under 3 How. Stat. § 300-la et seq., against Joseph A. Bennett and others, to condemn land for the opening and ex .'nsion of Campau street. Bespondents appeal from an order confirming the verdict of the jury.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
This is a proceeding to open Campau street, now a cul-de-sac, through to Ferry street.
Error is assigned upon the admission of the opinions of witnesses as to the necessity of the proposed opening. Eight witnesses were asked one of the following questions :
“What have you to say about its being or not being a necessary public improvement?
“From your knowledge of that part of the pity, and your acquaintance with its past and present condition and its present growth, state to the jury what reasons you have why the opening of this street is or is not a necessary public improvement, if you have any…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Joliet, Lockport & Aurora Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Henry v. Dubuque & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. Peoria & Farmington Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Rapids v. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Grafton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- City of Grand Rapids v. CoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Detroit, Ft. Wayne & Belle Isle Railway v. Commissioner of RailroadsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Bolles v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.