Legal Opinion

Bolles v. City of Montpelier

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 7, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition for the establishment of a public highway. Heard on the commissioners’ report at the September Term, 1919, Washington County, Fish, J., presiding. The Court ordered the highway established ‘ ‘ according to the provisions of the report. ’ ’ The petitionee and landowners excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The petitioners applied to the city council of Montpelier to lay a highway from Tremont Street, so called, in the city of Montpelier, along a route known as Guernsey Avenue Extension, to a house which was then being constructed by them. The length of the proposed street was about ten rods, and crossed land belonging to the estate of George Guernsey and land of Martin Shields and wife, upon which H. C. Shurtleff held a mortgage. The city council refused to establish the highway, and this petition was brought to the county court. Commissioners were appointed, and after a full hearing and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fadden v. McKinneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Johnson v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Town of Cavendish v. Town of TroySupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
  4. Luther Baker & Sons v. ShermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  5. Burwell v. . SneedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Town of CharlestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Pillsbury v. Town of WheelockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  3. Blanchard v. CrossSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  4. Cersosimo v. Town of TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API