Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
This appeal calls for the interpretation and construction of PA 1931, No 336, §§ 2 and 8, * and more particularly the Michigan highway commissioner’s right and authority to bind the State to pay for installation and operating expenses of a flasher light at a highway-railroad crossing.
The highway department sought permission to construct a highway across the tracks of the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company about 1/2 mile south of Holland, as part of a plan to relocate US-31.
In May, 1952, a meeting was held at the contemplated crossing by representatives of the highway department, the railroad,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Rapids v. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. HoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ram Broadcasting of Michigan, Inc v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Pekar v. Local Union No. 181 of International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Pekar v. Local Union No. 181 Of The International Union Of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink And Distillery Workers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962