Legal Opinion

United States v. Slatten

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 5, 2014No. Criminal No. 14-107 (RCL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge

Before the Court is defendant Nicholas Slatten’s motion [23] to dismiss the indictment for vindictive prosecution. Slatten alleges that the government increased the charge against him from voluntary manslaughter, 18 U.S.C. § 1112, to murder in the first degree, 18 U.S.C. § 1111, because he successfully asserted a statute of limitations defense. Upon consideration of Slat-ten’s motion [23], the government’s opposition [43],1 oral argument held on May 29, 2014, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court will DENY…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Nicholas SlattenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Bessler v. Tempe, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  3. People v. Anthony CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. BoucherDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  5. United States v. Nicholas SlattenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API