Legal Opinion

Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. David

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1977No. 7612SC665PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The determinative question is whether the trial court was correct in its conclusion that the 10 November 1972 agreement was a lease rather than a security agreement. We hold that it was.

The instrument on its face is designated a lease in which plaintiff is named as lessor and Key, Inc., is named as lessee. It is for a fixed term of 60 months and specifies the amount of the monthly rental payments to be made by the lessee to the lessor. In addition, the instrument contains the following provisions : no title or right in the equipment passes to lessee except the rights expressly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sigmund Sternberger Foundation, Inc. v. TannenbaumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. United States Leasing Corporation v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. In Re Wright Homes, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alpiser v. Eagle Pontiac-GMC-Isuzu, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Coode v. M & J Financial Corp. (In Re Boling)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. Equilease Corp. v. Loague (In Re Loague)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1982
  4. NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A. v. Capital Associates International, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API