Legal Opinion

United States Leasing Corporation v. Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 24, 1965No. 290PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, C.J.

The plaintiff and the additional defendant assign as error the finding of the court below that the contract between the plaintiff and defendant Hall is a chattel mortgage agreement and not a lease.

The evidence, in our opinion, is insufficient to support such a finding. While defendant Hall alleged in his counterclaim and cross action that R. W. Mathias brought to him for execution the “papers * * * for their finance of conditional sale agreement for payment in equal monthly installments of the $1,500.00, together with interest and carrying charges, over a five-year period, 60 months,” the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neal v. MarroneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Wilkins v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Bank of Varina v. SlaughterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Hill v. Star Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Bost v. BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Devita Fruit Company, Bankrupt, Quentin M. Derryberry Ii, Trustee v. Fca Leasing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. In Re Wright Homes, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1968
  3. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. DavidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Falco Corp. v. HoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API