Legal Opinion

Bahensky v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1992No. S-91-846Published

1Opinion of the Court

486 N.W.2d 883 (1992)

241 Neb. 147

Melvin BAHENSKY, Plaintiff,

v.

STATE of Nebraska et al., Defendants.

No. S-91-846.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

July 24, 1992.

John W. DeCamp, of DeCamp Legal Services, Lincoln, for plaintiff.

Don Stenberg, Atty. Gen., and L. Jay Bartel, Lincoln, for defendants.

Robert J. Huck, James F. Kasher, and David G. Wilwerding, of Croker, Huck, Kasher, Lanphier, DeWitt & Anderson, P.C., Omaha, for amicus curiae Metropolitan Omaha Builders Ass'n.

BOSLAUGH, WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, GRANT, and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ., and COLWELL, District Judge, Retired.

2Per curiam

This is an original action,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Neighborhoods, Inc. v. West Virginia Workers' Compensation FundCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  2. Jaksha v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Strawberries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Fitzgerald v. KuppingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. GalyenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API