Legal Opinion

Kingsley v. Kingsley

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 16, 1986No. 67843PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLIVER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Maurice Kingsley appeals from the circuit court’s order denying his motion to vacate the judgment by writ of coram nobis or, in the alternative, to set aside the judgment pursuant to Rule 74.32.

The Court of Appeals, Eastern District, reversed the circuit court, finding a Rule 74.32 irregularity in the deposition notice. We granted transfer to examine the scope of review on Rule 74.32 motions.

We find neither patent irregularities under Rule 74.32, nor justification for issuance of a writ of coram nobis. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Casper v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Draper v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Barney v. SuggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Potter v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Ozark County v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sher v. ChandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Treetop Village Property Owners Ass'n v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Penney v. Ozark Mountain Country Mall, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Smithey v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API