Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wallace

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1931No. Docket No. 6559PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff, a member of the firm of Wilson & Wagner, of Washington, D. C., income tax experts, and an assignee of said firm, filed his complaint for the reasonable value of services alleged to have been performed by the copartnership for defendant, under an alleged contract in writing, in defending the latter in certain proceedings initiated by the government to collect a tax and penalties aggregating $2,147,065.27. At the close of plaintiff’s case in chief the defendant moved for a nonsuit on the ground that the facts proved by plaintiff were not sufficient to justify a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Long v. StrausIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Beeson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. McCarthy v. Mount Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. RosamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Nagle Engine & Boiler Works v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Nomellini Construction Co. v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Simmons v. Birge Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1943
  5. Howard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API