Legal Opinion

Miller v. Central R.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 16, 1932No. 307PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The deceased was a locomotive engineer employed upon a work train, a “work extra,” of the defendant, moving east on a single track between a station known as Ware-ton, in New Jersey, and another known as Tom’s River. It had been used to pick up spent rails which had been laid along the roadbed, and was carrying a gang of section men, who had been working on the track, and pulling their tool and camp cars, which had been added to the train. The deceased had turned over the operation of the locomotive to the fireman, as the rules allowed, if done under his supervision,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. BolleSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co. v. BallardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  2. North Shore Corporation v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Hylton v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Wiggins v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. John Strykowski v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation, D/B/A Metra/metropolitan Rail, ("Metra")Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API