Irvine v. Bull
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
ERROR to the common pleas of Bradford county, David M. Bull against Andrew Irvine.' Action on the case; the verdict and judgment were for 200 hundred dollars, The facts of the case and the points ruled, are distinctly stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Huston, J.
The question in this cause arose- on the following *324statement of facts, which I will arrange according to the order of time, without, in all cases, regarding the order in which they came before the court.
About the close of 1828 Irvine and Bull agreed by parol for the sale and purchase of a vacant lot in (he town of Towanda. The price was to be 50 dollars, to be paid in cash when a deed was made and delivered, but it did not appear that any day was precisely appointed. Soon after this, the father-in-law of Bull called on Irvine and informed him…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Irvine v. BullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Schlosser v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828
3Cited by3 opinions
- Findlay & Hay v. KeimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Dauchy v. PondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
- Carner v. PetersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898