Schlosser v. Brown
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of York county. The plaintiff below, (who was also plaintiff in error,) declared as follows:— William II. Brown, Esq., late of the county aforesaid, attorney at law, was attached to answer Jacob Schlosser of a plea of trespass on the case, &c.
Read the full summary
IN ERROR. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of York county. The plaintiff below, (who was also plaintiff in error,) declared as follows:— William II. Brown, Esq., late of the county aforesaid, attorney at law, was attached to answer Jacob Schlosser of a plea of trespass on the case, &c. Whereupon the said Jacob, by Michael W. Ash, his attorney, complains, — that whereas the said William, on the 20th day of August,. A. D. one thousand eight hundred and nineteen, at the county aforesaid, was employed by the said Jacob, and undertook the care, management, and conducting of a certain suit in the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
(Tod, J., dissenting.) — This declaration contains in substance all the essentials of a cause of action, which is sufficient after verdict.
Judgment reversed, and judgment entered for the plaintiff
2Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
- Johnson v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1839
- Irvine v. BullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838