Dauchy v. Pond
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
ERROR to the common pleas of Crawford county. James Dauchy against Isaac W. Pond. Ejectment for 80 acres of land, to compel the specific execution of the following agreement, which the plaintiff gave in evideuce: Agreement, January 24th, 1834, between I. W. Pond, of the one part and James Dauchy of the other.
Read the full summary
ERROR to the common pleas of Crawford county. James Dauchy against Isaac W. Pond. Ejectment for 80 acres of land, to compel the specific execution of the following agreement, which the plaintiff gave in evideuce: Agreement, January 24th, 1834, between I. W. Pond, of the one part and James Dauchy of the other. Whereas, the said party of the first part hath agreed to sell to the said party of the second part a certain piece of land, situated in Spring township, &c., and bounded, &c, containing all my right title and interest within the boundaries above mentioned, for the.sum of 1000 dollars;…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Rogers, J.
By the article of agreement, dated the 24th of June 1834, Pond agrees to convey to Dauchy the premises in dispute, and to give him the possession on the 1st of March ensuing. In consideration Avhereof Dauchy agrees to pay 1000 dollars, 100 dollars in hand, 400 dollars on the 1st of May ensuing the date? and 500 dollars in two years from the said 1st day of May. The article further provides, that if Dauchy should fail to make payment, as before mentioned, the agreement is to be null and void and of no effect. Dauchy took possession of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Irvine v. BullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Shumaker v. LEARSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Becker v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Bonner v. Randal, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1925