Legal Opinion
Duncan v. Coffee County
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1995No. 94-5746PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal a judgment in this voting rights case in favor of Defendants-Appellees (collectively referred to as “Coffee County”). The district court entered the judgment in favor of Coffee County after the parties agreed to stipulated facts and presented oral argument. For the reasons set out more fully below, we affirm.
I
Coffee County, Tennessee is divided, for educational purposes, into three residential groupings. The first two include residents of the incorporated cities in the county, Tullaho-ma and Manchester. The third group consists of those who…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mixon v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Tanya Mixon, Denise Thomas, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. The State of Ohio and Michael White, Mayor of the City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Penny Moore v. The Board of Education of the Johnson City Schools Dr. R. Mike Simmons, Superintendent of the Johnson City SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Pinnell v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Duncan v. Coffee County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.