State v. Pittera

The defendant, Michael W Pittera, appeals from his conviction for negligent homicide, ESA 630:3, 1(a) (Supp. 1993), based on a jury verdict in the Superior Court (Fauver, J.). The defendant argues that: (1) the indictment was constitutionally insufficient in that it failed to allege a crime; and (2) the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain his conviction. We affirm.

The grand jury brought two indictments against the defendant, alleging alternative theories of negligent homicide. The defendant moved to have the indictments dismissed, and the trial court denied these motions.…