Legal Opinion
B & G INVESTMENT PARTNERS LP CORP. v. Thompson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2005No. Civ.A. 03-2469(EGS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff B & G Investment Partners LP Corporation (“B & G”) brings suit pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395, et seq. and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. 551, et seq., against defendant, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, claiming that the agency’s Provider Reimbursement Review Board’s decision denying plaintiff reimbursement for rental and other expenses under Medicare was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise not in accordance with the law. See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).
Pending before…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.