Legal Opinion

People v. Jack

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1989PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We agree with the Appellate Division that it was error for the trial court to refuse counsel’s request that it instruct ’the jury on alibi. The alibi testimony of defendant and his sister did not have to establish that it would have been impossible for the defendant to have committed the crime and need not have covered the whole time of the transaction in question (see, People v Holt, 67 NY2d 819, 820-821 [quoting People v Barbato, 254 NY 170, 178-179]). Rather, the evidence simply had to raise a reasonable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HoltNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. BarbatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. People v. ElmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. People v. La ChanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. McFarlaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API