Chicago Bridge & Iron Works v. Walker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C.
R. Y. Walker entered into a contract with the town of Buffalo to construct a waterworks system for the municipality. The Chicago Bridge & Iron Works furnished and installed a water tank for R. Y. Walker, in the course of the completion o£ the waterworks system. The contractor failed and refused to pay the company for the tank. The construction work was completed in May. The Chicago Bridge & Iron Works commenced its action in December on a builder’s bond against R. Y. Walker, as principal, and against B. E. Williams, W. W. Vincent, J. W. Carl, and Dr. E. M. Miller, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Surety Co. v. WaitsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Thompson v. Grider Implement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Coyle v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Federal Surety Co. v. St. Louis Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SolomonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Dolese Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Gasteam Radiator Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Clark Plastering Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932