Legal Opinion

Terry v. Baskin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1930No. 7432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellees Morrison, Lewis, and Baskin, instituted this suit for partition of 200 acres of land against the heirs at law of J. M. Terry, deceased. Terry originally owned the land. He was married twice. Of his first marriage there were six children, who are appellants here. Of the second marriage there were five children. Terry died intestate, leaving his second wife and his eleven children surviving him. Some six or more years after Terry's death his widow married one Maples, and a controversy arose between the appellants, children of the first marriage, and the surviving wife of the second…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Cooper v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. McCampbell v. DurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Bremond v. McLeanTexas Supreme Court · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Terry v. BaskinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Biggs v. PolingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Fuller v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Dennis Holt and Ann Holt Individually, and Dennis Holt Real Estate v. Daryl Robertson and Selena Robertson, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  5. Dennis Holt and Ann Holt Individually, and Dennis Holt Real Estate v. Daryl Robertson and Selena Robertson, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API