Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of Taylor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1975No. 7514DC59PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The Attorney General contends that this case is moot because of respondent’s unconditional release from John Umstead Hospital on 25 October 1974. This court has held that an appeal is not moot solely because the period of commitment has expired. In re Carter, No. 7415DC888 (N.C. App., filed on 16 April 1975). Therefore, we consider the appeal on its merits.

By his first assignment of error, respondent contends the court erred in denying his motion to strike the custody order and suppress all documents arising therefrom, for one or both of the following reasons: The petition upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Groves v. . WareSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. In Re Northwestern Bonding Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. In Re CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. In re Bonding Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faircloth v. BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Jackson v. Lundy Packing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API