State v. Franklin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
¶ 1. Defendants Jesse Franklin and Jeffery Huck seek review of two court of appeals' decisions in which the court denied the defendants' claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The defendants were convicted in separate trials on misdemeanor counts by six-person juries. Both defendants argue that they received ineffective assistance because their trial attorneys failed to object to the six-person juries, even though around the time of their trials the court of appeals certified State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998) to this court and we accepted this certification. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. PinnoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Hatem M. ShataWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. GuerardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Fernando Ortiz-MondragonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.