Legal Opinion
State v. Hatem M. Shata
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 2015No. 2013AP001437-CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.
¶ 1. This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of *68appeals,1 which reversed the Milwaukee County Circuit Court's2 judgment of conviction and order denying Hatem Shata's ("Shata") post-conviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to deliver marijuana, as party to a crime.
¶ 2. Shata argues that the circuit court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010).
¶ 3. Specifically,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. Ginger M. BreitzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Budziszewski v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. Sanmartin PradoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- State v. Gary F. LembergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Melisa ValadezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.