State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.
¶ 1. Lionel N. Anderson appeals the judgment convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1) (2001-02).1 Anderson submits that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court declined two requests by the jury for Anderson's testimony without Anderson's knowledge or input, violating his constitutional rights, and because he claims he was entitled to have his testimony *89reread to the jury. Alternatively, Anderson submits that because his attorney rendered ineffective assistance, he is entitled to a Machner hearing.2 After reviewing the record,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005