Legal Opinion
Amato v. Hernandez
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided December 3, 1998No. 01-97-00903-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
MICHOL O’CONNOR, Justice.
The Court has considered the motion for rehearing en banc filed by the appellee, Arthur Hernandez, and finds it without merit. The motion for rehearing is denied. The Court withdraws its earlier opinion and issues this opinion in its stead.
In three separate appeals, Aron Amato challenges a judgment nunc pro tune rendered in favor of Hernandez and the trial court’s refusal to dissolve two post-judgment writs of garnishment. Hernandez filed motions to dismiss in each of the appeals. The appeal from the entry of the judgment nunc…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Escobar v. EscobarTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Kelly v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mantis v. ReszCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- In the Interest of Z.J.W., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
- Taj Mohammed v. D. 1050 W. Rankin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- In Re Nazu, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Crown Bay Management, LLC D/B/A Lakeshore Village Apartments v. Surface Works, Inc. D/B/A Surface Connection and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.