Renden v. Geneva Development Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.
Defendant Geneva Development Corporation (Geneva) appeals from a judgment to the effect that there exists an easement for parking purposes appurtenant to the real property we refer to as parcel A, owned by plaintiffs, the servient tenement of which is the property referred to as parcel B, to which defendant Geneva holds a lease expiring on December 31, 2047. We affirm.
Facts
What follows is a skeletal outline of the basic facts. We omit matters and references to certain persons in the chains of title not necessary to an understanding of the legal issues. Subsidiary facts will be developed in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Olson v. CornwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Brown v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walker v. Stauffer Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Buehler v. Oregon-Washington Plywood Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
- Darr v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Zanelli v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Beyer v. Tahoe Sands ResortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.