Legal Opinion

Wilson v. McGuinness

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 4, 1910PublishedCited by 21 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by •

Garrison, J.

This was an information in the Supreme Court in the nature of a cjuo warranto, wherein, the issues were by consent of parties tried before Mr. Justice Swayze without a jury. The learned justice found that McGuinness had usurped tlie office of county collector of the county of Essex to the exclusion of the relator, Booth, who was lawfully entitled thereto. Judgment to that effect was rendered by the Supreme Court upon the postea, and this judgment is now under review by writ of error.

The facts were that McGuinness was appointed county col*348le…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. State ex rel. Fritts v. KuhlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Perkins v. EskridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Smith v. PentaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. In Re Application of LambNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API