Legal Opinion
Mateyka v. Schroeder
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 19, 1987No. 5-85-0227PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kasserman
Plaintiff, Alfred J. Mateyka, brought this action for the collection of a debt arising out of a real estate transaction. At trial, plaintiff contended that he was entitled to recover from the defendants either on the theory of contract* or on the theory of estoppel. After a bench trial, the trial court found that plaintiff could recover either on the theory of contract or estoppel and entered judgment against the defendants jointly and severally in the amount of $18,302.41 principal and $2,506.66 interest. Defendants Walter Greathouse, Mildred I. Greathouse, Otis G. Gosnell, Sandra E Gosnell,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Evanston v. PiotrowiczIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Tomaso v. Plum Grove BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- St. Ann's Home for the Aged v. DanielsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Szymkowski v. SzymkowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Elmore v. BlumeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bethany Pharmacal Company, Incorporated v. Qvc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Taylor MacHine Works, Inc., and William D. MettsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Progress Printing Corp. v. Jane Byrne Political CommitteeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Wasleff v. DeverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- National Diamond Syndicate, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.