Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Patterson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from District Court, Dallas County; E. B. Muse, Judge. Action by W. H. Patterson against the Hartford Life Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
On April 4, 1893, plaintiff in error, a life insurance company, contracted with defendant in error engaging him as its general agent in Texas. By subsequent amendments and substitutions this contract was changed as to commissions and renewals to be paid to Patterson and a partner who had become associated with him after the date of the first contract. The partner was eliminated before this controversy arose, and the agreements may be and will be stated as existent only between Hartford Life Insurance Company and Patterson. By a new agreement made between the parties on June 1, 1896,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Tullos v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of MarlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Williams v. EmbersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Bliss v. San Antonio School BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams, Et Ux. v. RobineauSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Rick v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Holland Texas Hypotheek Bank v. BroocksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Seamans Oil Company v. GuyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- McHaney v. HacklemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.